Main Menu

FM admits 'now is not the time'

Sturgeon puts independence vote ‘on hold’

Sturgeon: vote deferred

Another Scottish independence referendum has been put on hold until the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU have been clarified.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said today: “We will not seek to introduce the legislation for an independence referendum immediately.”

However, she said she would ‘reset’ the timetable. She would still aim to offer a new vote on Scotland leaving the UK after the terms of Britain’s decision to leave the EU were understood.

Scots voted against independence by 55% to 45% in 2014 but Ms Sturgeon has argued that a vote to leave the EU last year created the conditions for a second independence vote.

Her party’s decision to shelve the plan for at least two years comes after sustained pressure from opposition parties demanding that the SNP government focuses on running the country.

The SNP’s poor showing in the general election earlier this month will also have played a part as it indicated a weakening of support for independence and suggested that the party would lose if it put the issue to another vote.

She said a choice still needed to be offered, but the timing needed to be more cautious.

The SNP, supported by the Green party, gave the Scottish parliament a majority in calling for a referendum in 2018 or early 2019. Prime Minister Theresa May has refused to enter into discussions on the proposal.

The First Ministers’s full statement is published below


Liz Cameron, chief executive of Scottish Chambers of Commerce, said: “The First Minister’s new plan will enable an opportunity for Scotland’s politicians of all parties to focus on two clear objectives – to ensure that Scotland and the UK get the best deal possible from Brexit, and for the Scottish Parliament to deliver the improvements to skills, taxation, infrastructure and connectivity that we need here in Scotland.

“We support the First Minister’s call for the Scottish Government to play a full and integral role in the Brexit negotiations, and we also want to see wider Scottish interests, including our business community, represented in this.

“We don’t yet know what Brexit will look like, and our understanding of the terms of the final agreement will define the business and public response. At that point, there will no doubt be a time of public reflection in Scotland, and indeed throughout the UK, to consider the way forward.”

Hugh Aitken, CBI Scotland director, said:Businesses will welcome the First Minister’s recognition that getting the best deal for Scottish firms from Brexit must be the priority, rather than constitutional matters.

“What’s needed now is excellent coordination between the Scottish Government, the UK Government, and business to ensure Scotland’s interests are represented in the negotiations.

“As powers are repatriated from the EU to the UK and devolved nations, a joined-up discussion with business should take place so powers are returned to the right level and companies can continue to benefit from an effective UK single market.”

Robert Kilgour, founder of Scottish Business UK, a business group which campaigned against a second referendum, said: “It’s a relief that the First Minister has today announced that the prospect of another referendum on independence has been parked for the time being but they’ll be concerned that the engine is very much being kept running.

“Business leaders across all sectors in Scotland need a degree of stability to help attract new business and investment. So today’s decision will help in the short term, but the prospect of a return to a push for Indyref 2 as soon as next year will cause widespread concern.”

Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson said ministers should go further, and promise there will be no separation vote for at least the duration of the Scottish parliamentary term.

She said that far from being reasonable and listening to the public, Ms Sturgeon was “in denial” about her mistakes and losing credibility in her leadership as a result.

“The issue we have had this last year has been with a First Minister who tried to use the UK’s decision to leave the EU to impose another referendum on Scotland at the earliest opportunity”

She addd: “Today’s statement fails to give people any assurance that the First Minister has been listening. Instead, she appears to be in denial about her mistakes over this last year and, as a result, is leaking credibility and confidence in her leadership by the hour.”

Scottish Labour said Ms Sturgeon “has failed to listen to the people of Scotland” and will seek to ‘grow the movement’ for independence.

Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale said: “Nicola Sturgeon claims she has heard the views of the people and that she’s reflected on the result of the General Election. 

“And her incredulous conclusion is to double down and continue with her campaign for independence. The First Minister is digging her heels in, putting her fingers in her ears, and pressing on regardless. She’s not listening.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn added: “The election showed that the Scottish people do not want another unnecessary referendum.

“In Holyrood, the SNP government has failed to use the powers available to tackle inequality and protect public services.

“Scotland needs a Labour government that will bring hope, end austerity and transfer wealth, power and opportunity to the many from the few.”

Shadow Scottish Secretary Lesley Laird, said: “Despite the clear message sent to her, Nicola Sturgeon has shown again how she is more obsessed with independence than tackling the problems of low pay, poverty, declining public services and reducing public investment that each and every day impact on the lives of millions of Scots.”

The First Minister’s statement: 

Presiding Officer,

Like other countries, Scotland faces big challenges.

Some of those challenges, like Brexit, are not of our choosing.

But we must always remember that Scotland is one of the richest countries in the world, with resources and talent in abundance.

Our task is to make the most of our great potential and build the kind of country we want to be – a fair, prosperous, open and tolerant country.

In working towards that goal, my responsibility as First Minister is to build as much unity and consensus as possible.

That is why, after the election I said I would reflect on the outcome and, in particular, on the issue of an independence referendum.

I have done so carefully, taking time to listen to a broad spectrum of voices.

I want to set out today where those reflections have taken me.

Before I do so, let me underline two enduring points.

Firstly, it remains my view, and indeed the position of this government that at the end of the Brexit process, the people of Scotland should have a choice about our future direction as a country.

Indeed, the implications of Brexit are so potentially far reaching that, as they become clearer, I think people will increasingly demand that choice.

We face a Brexit we did not vote for, and in a form more extreme than most would have imagined just one year ago.

And now, the terms of that Brexit are being negotiated by a UK government with no clear mandate, precious little authority and no real idea, even within its own ranks, of what it is seeking to achieve.

While we must hope for the best, the reality is that with the UK government’s current approach, even a so-called good deal will be on terms substantially inferior to our current EU membership.

And, of course, there is now a real risk that the UK will crash out of the EU with no deal or a very bad deal – with deep and long lasting consequences for jobs, trade, investment, living standards and the opportunities open to future generations.

On top of all of that – as we saw so clearly in the deal struck with the DUP yesterday – we now have a UK government that talks about wanting to strengthen the bonds of the UK, but in reality is so desperate to cling on to power at any cost, that it is prepared to ride roughshod over the very principles of the entire devolution settlement.

So if Scotland is not simply to be at the mercy of events, but instead in control of our own future, then the ability to choose a different direction must be available to us.

Secondly, there is no doubt that the Scottish Government has a mandate to offer the people of Scotland that choice within this term of parliament.

We have now won not one, but two elections with that explicit commitment in our manifesto – and the Scottish Parliament has also endorsed that position.

By any normal standard of democracy that mandate is beyond question.

Opposition parties – no matter how strongly they disagree with us on independence, as is their right – should therefore stop trying to turn the basic rules of democracy on their head.

Presiding Officer,

The mandate we have is beyond doubt.

But deciding exactly how and when to exercise it is a matter of judgment – and it is a judgment that must be made in the interests of the country as a whole.

That is what I have been thinking carefully about.

Before, during and since the election campaign, I have had hundreds of conversations with people in every part of Scotland about the issues of Brexit and a second independence referendum.

There are, of course, some people who don’t want another referendum, ever, because they oppose independence in all circumstances.

I respect that position.

It is entirely honorable and just as legitimate as the position of those who support independence in all circumstances and want another referendum tomorrow.

But many people – probably the majority – fall into neither of these categories.

Indeed, having spoken to many people who voted Yes in 2014 and to many others who did not but who would be open minded in future, what has struck me is the commonality of their views.

They worry about the uncertainty of Brexit and the lack of any clarity whatsoever about what it means.

Some of them just want a break from the pressure of making big political decisions.

They agree that our future should not be imposed on us, but feel that it is just too soon right now to make a firm decision about the precise timing of a referendum.

They want greater clarity about Brexit to emerge first – and they want to be able to measure that up against clarity about the options Scotland would have for securing a different relationship with Europe.

And, in the meantime, whatever their scepticism about the likely outcome of the negotiations, they want the Scottish Government to focus as hard as we can on securing the best possible outcome for Scotland.

Indeed, that view has even more force now that the general election and the weakness of the UK government has re-opened the possibility, however narrow, of averting a hard Brexit and retaining membership of the single market.

I have a duty to listen to those views and I intend to do so.

The Scottish Government remains committed – strongly – to the principle of giving Scotland a choice at the end of this process.

But I want to reassure people that our proposal is not for a referendum now or before there is sufficient clarity about the options – but rather to give them a choice at the end of the Brexit process when that clarity has emerged.

I am therefore confirming today that, having listened and reflected, the Scottish Government will reset the plan I set out on March 13th.

We will not seek to introduce the legislation for an independence referendum immediately.

Instead, we will – in good faith – redouble our efforts and put our shoulder to the wheel in seeking to influence the Brexit talks in a way that protects Scotland’s interests.

We will seek to build maximum support around the proposals set out in the paper that we published in December – Scotland’s Place in Europe – to keep us in the single market, with substantial new powers for this parliament.

We will do everything we can to influence the UK in that direction.

And then at the end of this period of negotiation with the EU – likely to be around next autumn – when the terms of Brexit will be clearer, we will come back to Parliament to set out our judgment on the best way forward at that time, including our view on the precise timescale for offering people a choice over the country’s future.

In setting out this position today, I am also issuing a challenge to the other parties.

The Scottish Government will stand the best chance of positively influencing the Brexit outcome if we are at the table – with the full backing of our national Parliament – arguing for the sensible option of staying in the single market.

So join us now, with no equivocation – back the demands for the democratically elected Scottish Government to be at the table, able to influence the UK’s negotiating strategy, and for Scotland and the UK to stay in the single market.

Presiding officer,

The second conclusion I have reached is this.

Over the past few months, the focus on the when and how of a referendum has, perhaps inevitably, been at the expense of setting out the many reasons why Scotland should be independent.

The fact is we are only talking of another referendum so soon after the last one because of Brexit.

And it is certainly the case that independence may well be the only way to protect Scotland from the impact of Brexit.

But the case for an independent Scotland is not just about Brexit – it goes far beyond that.

Many of us already believe that independence is the right and the best answer to the many, complex challenges we face as a country – and also the best way to seize and fully realise our many opportunities.

But we must persuade the majority in Scotland of that.

We have not done that yet – but I have no doubt that we can.

So the challenge for all of us who believe that Scotland should be independent is to get on with the hard work of making and winning that case – on all of its merits – and in a way that is relevant to the changes, challenges, hopes and opportunities we face now and in the years ahead.

That is what we will do.

Of course we won’t do it on our own – because the independence case is bigger than us too.

We will engage openly and inclusively with, and work as part of, the wider independence movement.

We will seek to support, engage and grow that movement, and build the case that having decisions made by us – not for us – offers the best future for our country.

We will make, and seek to win the case that governing ourselves is the best way to tackle the challenges we face as a country – from building a better balanced and more sustainable economy, to growing our population, strengthening our democracy, and tackling deep seated problems of poverty and inequality.

Presiding Officer,

My last point, today, is this.

This government has been in office now for ten years.

I am incredibly proud of our achievements – delivered in the most challenging of circumstances and in the face of unprecedented Westminster cuts.

I am also clear about our priorities as we move forward – not just fighting Scotland’s corner in the Brexit talks, but also growing our economy and making sure that the public services we all rely on are there when we need them, from cradle to grave.

That means continuing to work each and every day to improve education, equip our NHS for the challenges of the future, lift people out of poverty and build a social security system with dignity at its heart.

But of course any government, after ten years, needs to take stock and refresh.

So over this summer, as we prepare our next Programme for Government and our budget for the year ahead, that is exactly what we will do.

We will set out afresh our vision for the country we lead, together with the creative, imaginative, bold and radical policies that, as far as is possible within the current powers available to us, will help us realise that bold, ambitious vision for Scotland.

We look forward to getting on with the job in the best interests of all the people of Scotland.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked as *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.